Check the instrument, timeframe and quoted prices first. Then separate visible evidence from interpretation, test the risk arithmetic and read the opposing scenario. Fluent writing is not proof of a correct chart read.
View full-size diagram
Scroll sideways to explore the diagram.
1. The report starts with the wrong chart facts
Read the symbol, venue, timeframe and last quoted price before the directional view. A report about a daily chart should not explain the candles as hourly observations. A price that is off by one digit can shift every level that follows.
Go back to the image when a number looks strange. If the labels are hard to read, export a clearer chart using the screenshot checklist. Guessing which digit the model meant adds another unverified assumption.
2. A precise level is treated as an exact boundary
A displayed level such as 104.37 looks more authoritative than “around 104.” Its precision may come from an estimate on an image. Check it against the chart’s price scale and the instrument’s price increment.
Support and resistance are commonly interpreted as areas. Fidelity’s guide explains how prior buying and selling can make an area relevant; it does not make the next reaction certain. Ask which visible swing or cluster supports the level and what would show that it has failed.
3. The explanation uses data the screenshot does not show
A candle can show that price fell. It cannot, by itself, identify the trader who sold or establish that liquidations caused the move. Order flow, liquidation data, open interest and news require their own evidence.
The same check applies to indicators. If the image has no readable volume panel, a claim of strong volume confirmation needs a separate source. A sensible report can say the evidence is unavailable. Filling every section is less useful than leaving a missing observation explicit.
4. An unfinished candle becomes a confirmed signal
The rightmost candle may still be forming. Its body, wick and close can change before the interval ends. A condition based on a candle close has not happened just because price briefly crossed a line.
Check the screenshot time and the rule being described. If a report calls a breakout confirmed, identify whether that means a wick, a close or a later retest. Those are different observations, with different waiting periods.
5. The trade plan looks tidy but the numbers do not work
For a hypothetical long entry at 100, stop at 95 and target at 110, the gross risk:reward is 1:2. A stop above the entry is inconsistent with that basic protective-stop setup. For a short, the price ordering reverses.
Include expected costs when checking the ratio. With ten units and total round-trip costs of 2, the planned loss becomes 52 and the potential net gain 98. The ratio is about 1:1.88. You can reproduce this in the risk-reward calculator.
A stop price is not a guaranteed fill price. Gaps and slippage can change the realized loss, so the planned number should never be presented as the maximum possible loss.
6. You read the favorable scenario and skip the other one
A bullish case is easy to remember when you already own the asset. Read the bearish case with the same care. Find the observation that would make your preferred explanation less credible.
If the answer is “nothing,” the explanation is not testable. Write down the level, candle interval or structural change that would invalidate it. Our multi-timeframe guide shows why a small rally and a larger downtrend can coexist.
7. A chart interpretation becomes a probability claim
“Bullish structure” is an interpretation. “An 80% chance of profit” is a statistical claim. The second needs a defined sample, outcome, timeframe and test method. One screenshot does not supply those.
With a record of completed trades, you can calculate expectancy from recorded wins and losses. Use the observed win rate and average amounts from that same sample; the result summarizes those inputs, without validating a probability quoted in an AI report.
OpenAI documents limitations in image interpretation, including errors with visual details and graphs. This does not measure TradeGPT’s performance, and we do not publish a verified win rate. A strong-looking report still needs checks against the original chart and information outside it.
Before paying for chart analysis, inspect the worked sample report. Look for observations you can verify, scenarios you can distinguish and missing information you can identify. Those are more useful evaluation criteria than a confident tone.
Your chart. A more structured read.
See how TradeGPT turns a chart screenshot into levels, competing scenarios and an execution plan. Start with the full sample, then bring your own chart.
The sample is open to everyone. Analyzing your own chart requires a subscription.
Sources & further reading
References checked September 8, 2026. Price examples and diagrams in this guide are hypothetical.